Looks like as long as you are white....(faggety French)

["Guest"]

...Or close enough to it, you can do what you want in the world. So the French go back to their former colony of the Ivory Coast. Those people had better take a page out of the Vietnamese book of "how to be white man" before that tangle with them. Africans have to realize that you have to have the power to back up your anger and acts of violence.

This also goes to show what I have always said. The US rules over the western hemisphere and Europe rules over the third world, unless the US has an "interest." The French are not waiting for the UN or any other approval. The Africans are stupid. The idea is to get nukes first, then start shit. But even with nukes you still have to have technology and well trained and equipped troops. The fact that ANY country can do what they want to an African country should let them know right there that they are not independent.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041107/ap_on_re_af/ivory_coast&cid=515&ncid=716

[meeso]

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 07:04:08 +0000, "Guest" posted a long article that has
no direct relation with **EGYPT** !

Please, do not send off-topic posts to "soc.culture.egyptian".

Thank you,
--
Maysara

[Bauer]

Post by "Guest"
...Or close enough to it, you can do what you want in the world. So the
French go back to their former colony of the Ivory Coast.

You mean the French didn't pass the "global test"? What? No
coalition?!!

Hey, I don't give a crap as long as the US stops playing global cop.
We need to get our troops back from Korea, Germany, Britain and
anywhere else we don't need to be. Let the EU build it's own army and
let them or China or Russia play global cop. What about those pansies
at the UN. They never like what we do so let them deal with it
themselves, they have an army (sort of). And if Iran or North Korea
want nuclear weapons, so what. If they can afford the development
cost, deployment cost and maintenance costs- I say go for it. And if
their people all starve to death because their government bought nukes
instead of food, well that's one less problem in the world. Heck, N.
Korea can't feed its people now. South Africa developed nukes but was
smart to get rid of theirs. After all, who the heck were they going
to nuke?

["Guest"]

--
This site exposes them all!

www.unclet.netfirms.com

Damn toms!

Post by Bauer

Post by "Guest"
...Or close enough to it, you can do what you want in the world. So the
French go back to their former colony of the Ivory Coast.

You mean the French didn't pass the "global test"? What? No
coalition?!!

If anything ever came up, they would say that their troops were attacked
first. Europes continued grip on Africa is why they have so many probelms
there.

Post by Bauer
Hey, I don't give a crap as long as the US stops playing global cop.
We need to get our troops back from Korea, Germany, Britain and
anywhere else we don't need to be. Let the EU build it's own army and
let them or China or Russia play global cop. What about those pansies
at the UN. They never like what we do so let them deal with it
themselves, they have an army (sort of). And if Iran or North Korea
want nuclear weapons, so what. If they can afford the development
cost, deployment cost and maintenance costs- I say go for it. And if
their people all starve to death because their government bought nukes
instead of food, well that's one less problem in the world. Heck, N.
Korea can't feed its people now. South Africa developed nukes but was
smart to get rid of theirs. After all, who the heck were they going
to nuke?

That's a good question. They claimed it was to stop the Soviets. Do you
really think that they could have stopped them? My guess is that they may
have been trying to stop and possible invasion of SA to make them leave the
country. Which could explain why they just let the natives vote so that
they could still stay there and run things. The new president is an example
of why Africa was conquered in the first place...